Every citizen, including former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, has the constitutionally protected right to express their views. But this freedom comes with the responsibility to speak truthfully and constructively, especially for those who have held high office. Gachagua’s recent conduct falls far short of this standard.
Since his historic impeachment by the National Assembly and subsequent removal by the Senate on October 18, 2024 – the first such dismissal of a Deputy President in Kenya’s history – Gachagua has embarked on what appears to be a vengeful crusade. The Senate found him guilty on five counts of constitutional violations, but rather than reflecting on these serious findings, he has chosen a path of bitter recrimination.
Gachagua has repeatedly made explosive allegations about President William Ruto, claims that are as sensational as they are unsubstantiated. He contends his impeachment was unfair because the proceedings continued in the Senate while he lay sick in a hospital and that he wasn’t given the opportunity to be heard.
His response initially was to challenge his impeachment through legal channels. His case is with the Court of Appeal, which is expected to issue a ruling on May 9. Whatever the decision the judges make, the outcome is likely to offer Gachagua yet more ammunition to continue his personal attacks on his opponents.
As Gachagua continues his revenge campaign, what’s particularly troubling is how eagerly certain media outlets have provided him a platform. Before his impeachment, he was widely criticised for promoting divisive, ethnocentric politics that most Kenyans reject. Now, it’s dumbfounding that he finds himself courted by these same media organisations despite offering nothing new or substantive in his interviews.
This raises serious questions about media responsibility. Why continue to amplify voices that sow division? Why provide a megaphone for unverified accusations that undermine public trust in institutions? They apparently prefer controversy over constructive discourse.
Equally concerning is that a prominent presidential aspirant appears to be seeking Gachagua’s support ahead of the 2027 elections, seemingly unbothered by the serious constitutional violations that led to the former DP’s removal from office. This political opportunism signals a dangerous willingness to overlook ethical breaches for potential electoral gain.
Kenyans deserve better. Media outlets should choose carefully the voices to amplify. They should demand evidence rather than serving as uncritical platforms for baseless allegations. Political leaders should seek allies who uphold constitutional values rather than those who undermine them.
While Gachagua has every right to speak, Kenyans have an equal right to expect responsible speech, especially from those who have held high office. Media outlets have an obligation to the public to place truth above sensationalism. And, as we have argued in this space before, those aspiring to lead Kenya should demonstrate their commitment to accountability by the company they keep.
