Sulemana Braimah Questions Credibility of National Honour Awards
News Hub Creator13h
Renowned journalist Sulemana Braimah has sparked a fresh wave of debate over the credibility of Ghana’s National Honour Awards, criticizing the selection of some recipients. His comments, shared on social media, have resonated with many who feel the awards fail to reflect the values of merit and integrity. Braimah remarked that the inclusion of certain individuals undermines the prestige of the awards. He questioned whether the honorees were truly deserving, given the controversies surrounding some of them. His sharp critique has amplified public scrutiny over the selection process and the criteria used to determine eligibility.
The journalist’s remarks have fueled conversations on social media, with many expressing agreement. Critics argue that the awards risk becoming a platform for political favoritism rather than a celebration of genuine contributions to national development. One social media user commented, “These awards have lost their value. They reward the wrong people while sidelining true patriots.” Supporters of the awards, however, argue that recognition is based on diverse achievements and contributions, not necessarily on public perception. They call for a balanced perspective, noting that national development takes many forms and impacts.
Braimah’s critique has reignited calls for transparency and reform in the award process. Advocates for change suggest implementing clear and objective criteria, as well as involving a broad, non-partisan panel in the selection process. This controversy highlights a deeper issue: the need for institutions and honors to uphold high standards of integrity and accountability. As the debate continues, many hope it will spark meaningful changes to restore trust in Ghana’s national awards.