Ghana’s financial year, ending on 31st December, is a colonial relic inherited from our colonial masters.
While the United Kingdom itself shifted its fiscal year to March 31 (later adjusted to April 5 for tax purposes) centuries ago, Ghana, like many African nations, has retained the December end-date.
This adherence to tradition, however, comes at a significant cost—misalignment with economic cycles, administrative inefficiencies, and currency pressures that undermine Ghana’s fiscal stability.
A growing number of countries have moved their financial year to 31st March to better suit their unique economic, cultural, and administrative needs.
The Case for Reform: Addressing Ghana’s Economic and Administrative Realities
The current financial year-end on December 31 coincides with a period of significant disruption. The Christmas and New Year festivities, widely celebrated across the country, bring a slowdown in business activity and government operations.
Companies wind down, employees take leave, and administrative processes stall, making it an impractical time to close financial books, conduct audits, or finalize tax assessments. This congestion leads to rushed reporting and inefficiencies that compromise accuracy. Shifting the financial year to end on March 31 would allow businesses and government agencies to avoid this year-end bottleneck, ensuring smoother operations and more reliable financial data.
The timing also exacerbates pressure on the Ghanaian Cedi. Multinational corporations typically declare profits and repatriate funds at the end of the calendar year, overlapping with heightened demand for foreign exchange (forex) from local businesses importing goods after the holiday season. This dual demand strains the Cedi, contributing to depreciation and economic instability.
A March year-end would stagger these financial outflows, reducing competition for forex and enabling the Bank of Ghana to better manage currency stability.
Beyond these immediate concerns, a March 31, financial year-end offers broader advantages for fiscal planning and economic alignment. Ghana’s economy, heavily reliant on agriculture—particularly cocoa—experiences significant seasonal fluctuations.
The cocoa harvest peaks between October and February, with financial transactions extending into early the following year. Closing the financial year in March would provide a clearer picture of these economic trends, enhancing budget preparation and revenue forecasting.
Advantages of a April 1 to March 31 Financial Year
Firstly, changing the financial year period allows for better fiscal planning and budget implementation as the March year-end allows the government to align budget preparation with actual revenue trends, avoiding the last-minute spending rushes often seen in December to exhaust budgets.
The Finance Minister presents the annual budget in October/November with year-end estimates to Parliament. However, shifting the financial year end to March 31, also gives us a true and accurate state of the economy. This would take away the mid-year budget presentation.
A March closing captures the full scope of agricultural and trade cycles, providing a more accurate snapshot of Ghana’s economy
Secondly, it helps to reduce the strain on businesses and agencies juggling holiday slowdowns with financial closures, improving efficiency.
Thirdly, this resolves the jurisdictional gridlocks with regard to multinational firms in Ghana that have to comply with Ghana’s financial year and that of their parent company’s financial year abroad.
Fourthly, extending the financial year-end to March gives the Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA) and local authorities more time to assess and collect taxes after businesses close their books, enhancing accuracy and compliance.
Additionally, it would facilitate smoother parliamentary budget approvals: Parliament typically debates the budget in November and December. A March year-end offers more time to review actual figures, leading to informed fiscal decisions.
During electioneering years, MPs become very concerned about maintaining their seats in Parliament rather than spending time to debate the budget and pass the Appropriation Bill. Whenever there is a transition from one government to another, the new government has some time to prepare its budget.
Lessons from Global Success Stories
Countries that have adopted a March 31, financial year-end offer valuable insights for Ghana. India’s financial year runs from April 1 to March 31, a practice retained post-independence to align with its monsoon-driven agricultural cycle (June to September).
This timeline allows the government to assess crop yields and economic performance before finalizing budgets, enhancing fiscal planning. India’s decision to stick with this cycle—despite briefly considering a calendar-year alignment—underscores its practicality for an agrarian economy, a context Ghana shares with its cocoa and other agricultural sectors. The UK,
Japan provides another example. Its fiscal year, ending on March 31, aligns with the cherry blossom season and the academic calendar, but more critically, it supports corporate reporting and government budgeting. Japanese businesses, including multinationals, benefit from a stable reporting period free of holiday disruptions, while the government uses the early-year window to implement budgets effectively. This synchronization has contributed to Japan’s reputation for fiscal discipline and economic efficiency.
Conclusion
Going forward, I think it would be great for the government to convene stakeholder consultation with businesses, tax authorities, economists, and parliamentarians to build consensus and address sector-specific concerns and adopt a gradual transition to the new regime. If in 2007 Ghana could successfully re-denominate the Ghanaian currency, I am sure we can also make headway.
By aligning our fiscal and financial year period to a regime that better aligns with our economic realities and international best practices, we can ultimately foster greater fiscal stability and sustainable growth.
By Appiah Kusi Adomako.
The writer is an economist, lawyer, and consumer protection advocate. He is the West Africa Regional Director of CUTS International.
He can be contacted via email: [email protected] or www.cuts-accra.org or 0302245652