In a Facebook post, Azar highlighted the uncertainty gripping Umuofians (a term he uses to represent Ghana), as the controversy continues to unfold.
“Rumors surge as Umuofians weigh whether ‘No Dancing, No Vetting (NDNV)’ standoff will unravel Suhuyini’s Smock Diplomacy,” he wrote, referencing the dramatic turn of events in Parliament.
The controversy began when vetting panel member Alexander Afenyo-Markin requested Justice Srem Sai to perform a certain kind of dance. This unusual request sparked immediate reactions, as the chairman of the vetting committee overruled the demand.
However, the incident did not end there. Frustrated by what they saw as an inappropriate and distracting moment in the vetting process, the Minority Caucus staged a boycott, refusing to participate in the remaining vetting sessions.
Azar’s reference to “Suhuyini’s Smock Diplomacy” alludes to the role played by Alhassan Suhuyini, a key figure in the Minority Caucus, and perhaps a metaphor for the broader political struggle at play.
The term suggests that Suhuyini’s stance—whether through his leadership, symbolic cultural representation, or protest—will be tested as the Minority’s boycott unfolds.
The ‘No Dancing, No Vetting’ (NDNV) saga has now turned into a larger political debate, raising questions about the seriousness of the vetting process.
While some see Afenyo-Markin’s request as a lighthearted moment blown out of proportion, others argue that it undermines the dignity of the process and disrespects nominees.
As the impasse continues, Umuofians are left wondering whether this standoff will force a reevaluation of vetting protocols or deepen the partisan divide even further.
https://web.facebook.com/kwaku.azar/posts/pfbid02TSigNV73g8LXstPJcjH4nCRvDeHab5kNs2FyiEcPfYPgPp8uUzMoDU4q8TA3jkf9l