The Member of Parliament (MP) for Walewale, Dr. Tiah Abdul Kabiru Mahama, has strongly criticized the government’s decision to impose a curfew on residents amid ongoing attacks by unidentified individuals.
While acknowledging the need for peace and security, he argued that the curfew was imposed without thorough analysis, ultimately victimizing residents and creating distress within the constituency.
Speaking on Eyewitness News on Citi FM on Monday, February 17, Dr. Mahama highlighted the adverse impact of the 6 AM to 6 PM curfew, stating that it has severely restricted movement and heightened frustrations.
He expressed disappointment over the decision, noting that it was unexpected, especially given the government’s commitment to maintaining stability in Walewale and Ghana at large.
He further insisted that a different strategy should have been adopted to protect travelers and prevent further loss of innocent lives while working toward lasting peace in Bawku and other affected areas.
Dr. Mahama also criticized the lack of inclusivity in the decision-making process, alleging that key stakeholders, including himself, were not consulted. He claimed that despite the Regional Minister advising against the curfew, the President and the Interior Minister proceeded with its enforcement.
“The decision to impose a curfew is rather unfortunate. As much as we appreciate and understand the government’s commitment to ensuring peace and stability in Walewale and Ghana at large, especially for travelers passing through the constituency, they did not expect the government to take such a draconian approach that limits their freedom of movement. This approach makes the people of Walewale victims of a situation persisting in the constituency, so they are not happy.”
“I am particularly not happy. I feel the government could have handled this differently to ensure the safety of travelers while curbing the loss of innocent lives and working toward lasting peace in Bawku and other affected areas.”
“I think the decision was poorly made. I have made this statement clearly and want to reiterate that it lacked comprehensive analysis. We are now learning from the Regional Minister that he advised against it, yet the President and the Interior Minister went ahead with the decision.”
“That was also poorly handled because, before this decision, some MPs were consulted, yet I was not engaged.”