They argue that this move is unnecessary and could harm Ghana’s justice system.
During a press conference on January 15, 2025, the Minority criticized the proposal, likening it to a regression toward an ineffective justice system.
Dr. Ayine, during his appearance before Parliament’s Appointments Committee on January 13, advocated for the creation of public tribunals in local communities to supplement the existing regional courts.
He claimed these tribunals would provide a more accessible and effective means of addressing specific cases, particularly local disputes and criminal issues.
However, the Minority dismissed this rationale, contending that Ghana’s current judicial system is sufficient to handle the nation’s legal requirements.
They raised concerns about the need for public tribunals, especially given the significant advancements in court infrastructure across the country.
John Darko, the MP for Suame, spoke on behalf of the Minority at the press conference, labeling the proposal as a retrogressive step.
He emphasized the historical associations between public tribunals and abuses of power, as well as political meddling.
He questioned the necessity of public tribunals, asking what shortcomings exist in the High Court that warrant their establishment.
Darko pointed out that over the past eight years, 110 new courts have been established through the District Assembly Common Fund.
He argued that if the goal is to increase court availability, both major parties should focus on building more courts.
He further noted that the Chief Justice has the authority to create specialized courts, including criminal high courts, making the introduction of public tribunals unnecessary.