Former Deputy Communications Minister, Felix Kwakye Ofosu
• Felix Kwakye Ofosu has taken a swipe at some mainstream media who have gone silent on Chief Justice Kwasi Anin-Yeboah’s bribery case
• He said these media houses are to be watchdogs and not guard dogs
• Meanwhile, Chief Justice Kwasi Anin-Yeboah has refuted the allegations levelled against him
Former Deputy Communications Minister under the erstwhile Mahama administration, Felix Kwakye Ofosu, has raised eyebrows at some media outlets over their silence on a US$5,000,000 bribery allegation levelled against Chief Justice Kwasi Annin-Yeboah.
He averred that there is a concerted effort by some mainstream media to conceal the wrongdoings of some high-profile personalities in the country.
Though he didn’t point out these mainstream media who have stayed mute on the growing development, he heaped praises on Ghana’s number 1 online news portal, GhanaWeb, for undertaking what he describes as fearless journalism.
In a Facebook post sighted by GhanaWeb, Felix Kwakye Ofosu said, “Is it me or there is a deliberate effort by mainstream media in Ghana to blackout the story involving the Chief Justice, with the notable exception of GhanaWeb?
While I believe firmly that everyone deserves a fair hearing when accused, we cannot adopt a scared cow mentality where there is a concerted effort by the media to conceal alleged wrongdoing on the part of some categories of public officials.”
“When they say they undertake fearless journalism, it must reflect in their deeds. They are to be watchdogs, not guard dogs. If a politician was so accused, they would run with it within minutes of the story breaking. It is embarrassing that they would even ponder blacking out a matter like this,” part of his post read.
Meanwhile, the Chief Justice has directed the Department of the Police (CID) to conduct investigations into a bribery allegation levelled against him.
Read his Facebook post below
Background
The Chief Justice and lawyer Akoto Ampaw have been named in a statement by one Kwasi Afrifa of O&A Legal Consult, addressed to the Disciplinary Committee of the General Legal Council, in which he [Afrifa] alleges that his client, Ogyeedom Obranu Kwesi Atta VI, once told him that “the Chief Justice had demanded a bribe of US$5,000,000 for a successful outcome of his case.”
Kwasi Afrifa’s statement dated July 8, 2021, is a response to a claim by Ogyeedom Obranu Kwesi Atta VI that he [Afrifa] while handling his case – Ogyeedom Obranu Kwesi Atta VI v Ghana Telecommunications Co. Ltd. – suggested to him [Ogyeedom] to “provide an amount of US$100,000 to enable him to do some ways and means (gymnastics)” on the case “so that we can obtain a favorable decision.”
Ogyeedom in his petition to the GLC on March 1, 2021, said despite knowing he had a good case before the Supreme Court of Ghana, he heeded the advice of his lawyer. However, he later realized that money was not used for the intended purpose.
“…so I fired him from the case and asked him to refund the money but he has since refunded US$25,000 leaving a balance of US$75,000 due and owing to me. All efforts to retrieve the amount have failed,” Ogyeedom Obranu Kwesi Atta VI stated while he appealed to the Chairman of the General Legal Council to help him retrieve the remaining amount from lawyer Kwasi Afrifa.
In a three-paged response available to GhanaWeb, Kwasi Afrifa has unequivocally denied all the claims. According to him, he never suggested to Ogyeedom Obranu Kwesi Atta VI to provide any amount for what he described as ‘ways and means’.
While Kwasi Afrifa admitted to being Ogyeedom Obranu Kwesi Atta VI’s former attorney, he refuted the latter’s claim of requesting and taking funds to bribe the Chief Justice.
“At the end of July 2020, the Petitioner informed me that friends of his who were highly connected politically had taken him to see the Chief Justice who had agreed to help him win his case on condition that he drops my goodself as the lawyer handling the case for him and engage Akoto Ampaw Esq in my stead,” Kwasi Afrifa said.
“He further informed me that the Chief Justice had demanded a bribe of US$5,000,000 for a successful outcome to his case and that he had already paid US$500,000 to the Chief Justice. He further indicated that he was hard-pressed to raise the remainder of the US$5,000,000 and so I should refund some of the GH¢300,000 paid me as fees because he had in line with the advice of the Chief Justice, engaged Akoto Ampaw Esq as solicitor to continue the case before the Supreme Court,” Afrifa added.
After the said demand was made, Afrifa said he rather took a decision to refund the amount Ogyeedom Obranu Kwesi Atta VI paid him for handling his case. This, he argued, he did out of a sense of dignity.
He said: “we aggregated the GH¢300,000 paid to me as being the equivalent of US$50,000 which I was to refund to him without any timeline being indicated. He said he wanted the payment in dollars because he was raising the remainder of the money to be paid the Chief Justice, and that currency was the currency of choice.
“On the 27th of January 2021, I paid an amount of US$25,000 to the petitioner and subsequently paid US$15,000 to him making a total of US$40,000 so the outstanding amount that I have to refund to him is US$10,000. I am ready willing and able to make the said payment of US10,000 when I appear before the Committee on the 15th of July, 2021.”